galacticpierre
- Msn Free Online Ultimate Texas Holdem Poker
- See More Results
- Ultimate Texas Holdem Practice On Web Site - Wizard Of Vegas
- Discussionabout The Auckland Variant In My Forum At Wizard Of Vegas.
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if someone can help me calculate the odds and optimal strategy for a version of Ultimate Texas Hold'em that I saw in Europe.
Basically the rules are all the same except for one major difference. If the casino doesn't qualify, the casino pays you the 'play' regardless of who would have won the hand. The ante is still a push. Traditionally if the dealer does not open and the dealer wins the hand then you would lose the 'blind' and the 'play' and push the 'ante'.
I'll give an example :
1.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and player wins hand, I collect $4 play, Push on Ante and Blind. Traditionally I would collect $4 play push on ante and blind (This is the same)
2.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and dealer wins hand, I collect $4 play, push on ante and blind. Traditionally I would lose $4 play, lose $1 blind, and push ante.
I was wondering if someone can help me calculate the odds and optimal strategy for a version of Ultimate Texas Hold'em that I saw in Europe.
Basically the rules are all the same except for one major difference. If the casino doesn't qualify, the casino pays you the 'play' regardless of who would have won the hand. The ante is still a push. Traditionally if the dealer does not open and the dealer wins the hand then you would lose the 'blind' and the 'play' and push the 'ante'.
I'll give an example :
1.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and player wins hand, I collect $4 play, Push on Ante and Blind. Traditionally I would collect $4 play push on ante and blind (This is the same)
2.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and dealer wins hand, I collect $4 play, push on ante and blind. Traditionally I would lose $4 play, lose $1 blind, and push ante.
Ultimate Texas Hold'em (UTH) is one of the most popular novelty games in the market. For that reason, it is important to understand the multitude of ways that UTH may be vulnerable to advantage play. Many of my recent posts have concerned some of these possibilities. But the computations are tedious. May 08, 2019 I was wondering if someone can help me calculate the odds and optimal strategy for a version of Ultimate Texas Hold'em that I saw in Europe. Basically the rules are all the same except for one major difference. If the casino doesn't qualify, the casino pays you the 'play' regardless of who would have won the hand. The ante is still a push. Practice playing Ultimate Texas Hold 'Em with the Wizard's game which offers perfect strategy advice or select an online casino to play for real money ? Practice Ultimate Texas Hold'Em® for Real Money or Free - Wizard of Odds.
beachbumbabsAdministrator
Thanks for this post from:
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if someone can help me calculate the odds and optimal strategy for a version of Ultimate Texas Hold'em that I saw in Europe.
Basically the rules are all the same except for one major difference. If the casino doesn't qualify, the casino pays you the 'play' regardless of who would have won the hand. The ante is still a push. Jackpot 1 casino tunica ms. Traditionally if the dealer does not open and the dealer wins the hand then you would lose the 'blind' and the 'play' and push the 'ante'.
I'll give an example :
1.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and player wins hand, I collect $4 play, Push on Ante and Blind. Traditionally I would collect $4 play push on ante and blind (This is the same)
2.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and dealer wins hand, I collect $4 play, push on ante and blind. Traditionally I would lose $4 play, lose $1 blind, and push ante.
I was wondering if someone can help me calculate the odds and optimal strategy for a version of Ultimate Texas Hold'em that I saw in Europe.
Basically the rules are all the same except for one major difference. If the casino doesn't qualify, the casino pays you the 'play' regardless of who would have won the hand. The ante is still a push. Jackpot 1 casino tunica ms. Traditionally if the dealer does not open and the dealer wins the hand then you would lose the 'blind' and the 'play' and push the 'ante'.
I'll give an example :
1.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and player wins hand, I collect $4 play, Push on Ante and Blind. Traditionally I would collect $4 play push on ante and blind (This is the same)
2.) Ante $1, Blind $1, Play $4. - Dealer does not quality and dealer wins hand, I collect $4 play, push on ante and blind. Traditionally I would lose $4 play, lose $1 blind, and push ante.
Apr 30, 2016 I have used 'Practice Ultimate Texas Hold'em' a lot to learn how to play correctly, but occasionally I find what appears to be wrong advice. Here's example I just ran into: 10c 4s with Ah 2s 7s on board. I checked and it said that was wrong play. When I put cards into 'Ultimate Texas Hold ’Em® Calculator' it said correct play is CHECK. Texas Hold'em, Video Texas Hold'em This works for any pair and overcards (even 22 vs 34, for example). Wizard of odds texas holdem bonus bermain poker menghasilkan uang. Position is wizard of odds texas holdem bonus very important in hol war snoqualmie casino 'em.
So.
I get, from WoO tables. Hands where dealer does not qualify, but wins the hand, with occurences of large, medium, and small Play bets.
Msn Free Online Ultimate Texas Holdem Poker
So you not only don't lose, you are paid - a net gain in PA of both values, for that percentage of hands expected in each case to be dealer wins.
-5 becomes +4 on 0.003641 (*9) = 0.033219
-3 becomes +2 on 0.000287 (*5) = 0.001435
-2 becomes +1 on 0.001698 (*3) = 0.005094
Total change in +EV = 0.039748
Normal HE is 0.02185 . So the player has an advantage of 0.017898 (1.7898%) with these rules.
https://wizardofodds.com/games/ultimate-texas-hold-em/
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
beachbumbabsAdministrator
Thanks for this post from:
I guess I would say, if there is no pair, 4 to a flush, or 4 to an outside straight on the board, you might want to not fold at all. Not sure. I don't think I would change any other BS decisions.If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
galacticpierre
Thanks for that,
do you think that I should modify my hand selection for a large play bet preflop? Should I play more aggressively, a wider range of hands?
do you think that I should modify my hand selection for a large play bet preflop? Should I play more aggressively, a wider range of hands?
beachbumbabs
Administrator
Administrator
Grosvenor casino northampton restaurant. Thanks for that,
do you think that I should modify my hand selection for a large play bet preflop? Should I play more aggressively, a wider range of hands?
do you think that I should modify my hand selection for a large play bet preflop? Should I play more aggressively, a wider range of hands?
See More Results
Personally, no, I don't. I think the only modification I would make is not folding when there's a good chance the dealer won't qualify, as above.
I think the strategy is so aggressive in the first place, you just put larger amounts at risk without any assurance at the 4x and 2x points that the dealer WON'T qualify.
You already have a Player Advantage with the messed up rules. You will stretch that PA further by not folding hands at the 1x or Fold point, so maybe up to 3% or so PA. But they will still take your money if the dealer qualifies and wins, so why expose more at the 4x and 2x points than the hand is worth?
Ultimate Texas Holdem Practice On Web Site - Wizard Of Vegas
If the House lost every hand, they wouldn't deal the game.
galacticpierre
Discussionabout The Auckland Variant In My Forum At Wizard Of Vegas.
Hi,
I have one other question if you don't mind helping me with. I've looked through he math and it looks very solid, however I have tried to put it into practice and I played about 12 hours with another person at a rate of about 60 hands per hour each which comes out to roughly 1,440 hands. We are currently losing 260 betting units. Is this within the range of statistical anomaly? I used to count cards in blackjack and you could 'feel' the edge. For some reason I don't feel it that much in this game.
On a last note I believe to be playing pretty much 100% correct according to basic strategy on WoO. I would appreciate your help in this matter.
I have one other question if you don't mind helping me with. I've looked through he math and it looks very solid, however I have tried to put it into practice and I played about 12 hours with another person at a rate of about 60 hands per hour each which comes out to roughly 1,440 hands. We are currently losing 260 betting units. Is this within the range of statistical anomaly? I used to count cards in blackjack and you could 'feel' the edge. For some reason I don't feel it that much in this game.
On a last note I believe to be playing pretty much 100% correct according to basic strategy on WoO. I would appreciate your help in this matter.